Without followers there are no leaders and without leaders there are no followers. The purpose for this essay is to compare and contrast followership and servant leadership. Ervin All Soldiers are leaders but to be a leader you must be a follower. Air Command and Staff College Air University. 100 (32) View full document Compare and Contrast Followership and Servant Leadership SGT Kayla L. Say no to “Yes Men”: Followership in the modern military. However, the similarities like prioritizing the group’s dynamic make servant guidance a valuable style that contributes to better teamwork. A compare-and-contrast essay is a style of essay that points out the similarities and differences between two or more subjects. A follower acts as a part of the community and focuses on internal growth to reach the team’s goal, while the manager is motivated to sustain the growth of the followers externally. Their team of writers ensures that each paper is. In conclusion, despite numerous commonalities between servant leadership and followership, they serve different goals. A professional essay writing service that provides students with well-researched and compelling essays. As opposed to the long-term vision of the organizer, task-oriented followers lack conceptualization. Additionally, followers act as passive recipients of guidance that the manager actively provides (Leadership, n.d). Nonetheless, followers are intrinsic and self-focused, unlike servant leaders who aim to facilitate the growth of others. The third similarity is emotional intelligence since the followers are cooperation-oriented and leaders need to be “healing, listening, and empathetic” (Leadership, n.d., p. Independence is another identical characteristic: followers need to be “self-reliant in implementing organizational goals,” while managers have to be autonomous to maintain the authority (Corrothers, 2009, p. For instance, followers and leaders have to be critical thinkers. Comparing and Contrastingīoth similarities and differences can be found between the two notions. Consequently, the role of a follower dynamic significantly relies on one’s guidance and analytical skills. A model developed by Kelley has emphasized: “independent critical thinking and active participation” as two dimensions of the effectiveness of a follower (Corrothers, 2009, p. On the other hand, followership is defined as the foundation of group work, and the followers are the primary recipients of one’s leadership. Thus, a servant leader has a particular set of qualities and intentions that target the balance between the pursuit of the goal and the personal development of the followers. Servant leaders are characterized by their traits and goals like “listening, empathy, healing, awareness, persuasion, conceptualization, foresight, stewardship, commitment to the growth of people, and building community” (Leadership, n.d., p. When comparing and contrasting the two concepts, addressing their definitions is essential.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |